Comments on: Mounting Samba on Linux: smbfs vs cifs http://blog.verwilst.be/2008/04/21/mounting-samba-on-linux-smbfs-vs-cifs/ Linux, Open Source. That's pretty much it. Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:23:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Sérgio http://blog.verwilst.be/2008/04/21/mounting-samba-on-linux-smbfs-vs-cifs/comment-page-1/#comment-367 Sérgio Fri, 15 May 2009 17:22:00 +0000 http://weblog.verwilst.be/?p=59#comment-367 CIFS works fine to mount windows9x ? CIFS works fine to mount windows9x ?

]]> By: stintel http://blog.verwilst.be/2008/04/21/mounting-samba-on-linux-smbfs-vs-cifs/comment-page-1/#comment-121 stintel Fri, 09 May 2008 13:11:54 +0000 http://weblog.verwilst.be/?p=59#comment-121 Another nice thing about CIFS is that it should survive a network outage or even a reboot of the system you are mounting a share from :) Another nice thing about CIFS is that it should survive a network outage or even a reboot of the system you are mounting a share from :)

]]> By: vincent http://blog.verwilst.be/2008/04/21/mounting-samba-on-linux-smbfs-vs-cifs/comment-page-1/#comment-116 vincent Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:06:29 +0000 http://weblog.verwilst.be/?p=59#comment-116 @TimothyP : i told you a year ago about this. i guess you must have forgot about it :) @TimothyP : i told you a year ago about this. i guess you must have forgot about it :)

]]> By: TimothyP http://blog.verwilst.be/2008/04/21/mounting-samba-on-linux-smbfs-vs-cifs/comment-page-1/#comment-114 TimothyP Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:05:18 +0000 http://weblog.verwilst.be/?p=59#comment-114 Now that I didn't know, I'll add it to the guide :-) Now that I didn’t know,
I’ll add it to the guide :-)

]]> By: verwilst http://blog.verwilst.be/2008/04/21/mounting-samba-on-linux-smbfs-vs-cifs/comment-page-1/#comment-113 verwilst Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:37:18 +0000 http://weblog.verwilst.be/?p=59#comment-113 On a related note, SMBFS also has a 2GB filelimit, which CIFS doesn't have. On a related note, SMBFS also has a 2GB filelimit, which CIFS doesn’t have.

]]> By: verwilst http://blog.verwilst.be/2008/04/21/mounting-samba-on-linux-smbfs-vs-cifs/comment-page-1/#comment-112 verwilst Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:06:24 +0000 http://weblog.verwilst.be/?p=59#comment-112 Yeah, but guys still using the good old way ;) or people using non-cifs-defaulting distro's might very well bump into this issue :) I just did because i figured smbfs would be an alias to cifs by now :D Guess i was wrong. Yeah, but guys still using the good old way ;) or people using non-cifs-defaulting distro’s might very well bump into this issue :) I just did because i figured smbfs would be an alias to cifs by now :D Guess i was wrong.

]]> By: TimothyP http://blog.verwilst.be/2008/04/21/mounting-samba-on-linux-smbfs-vs-cifs/comment-page-1/#comment-111 TimothyP Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:49:35 +0000 http://weblog.verwilst.be/?p=59#comment-111 Which is why Ubuntu defaults to CIFS :-) Which is why Ubuntu defaults to CIFS :-)

]]>